Op 12/19/2017 om 8:41 AM schreef Adam Weinberger:
> I'm getting a behaviour with pigeonhole that I wasn't expecting. Am I
> misunderstanding the design?
>
> I run my messages through a vnd.dovecot.filter. It's essentially this:
>
> filter "spam_filter";
> if spamheaders {
> fileinto "spam";
> stop;
> }
>
> Mail stored in the spam folder is the filtered version, but the
> implicit-keep message is the original, unfiltered message. If I add an
> explicit `keep;` to the end, it stores the filtered version into my
> inbox.
>
> Based on the filter RFC, I was expecting the implicit keep to retain
> the filtered version. Am I misinterpreting the spec?
I did a quick test, and I am not seeing any problems.
However, what is that spamheaders test in your script?
Regards,
Stephan.
