> > I went to go verifying in dovecot-pigeonhole that the two new patches are
> > there
> > by manual inspect the source files you patched. I found only the first one,
> > not
> > http://hg.rename-it.nl/dovecot-2.2-pigeonhole/rev/1eb0362461f0 maybe this
> > because I downloaded a snap shot link at the top that wasn't built with the
> > 2nd change?
> >
> > I put 2nd change in manually (its only one liner) rebuilded and after
> > install.....
> > same error with recv(MSG_PEEK)
> >
> > Thanks for ongoing help
>
> Argh! Ok, that fix was a bit incomplete still:
>
> http://hg.rename-it.nl/dovecot-2.2-pigeonhole/rev/89e0cef5b264
Sorry I over-looking this. I just tested with this new fix. IT WORKS.
> I wonder why my test didn't fail.
>
> The extent of this bug is limited to using execute as a command (as
> opposed to using it as a test in an `if' statement) and not providing it
> with any input.
That's not matching to my environment. My script is calling execute
within a if block but not as a test but it IS providing input (but not get
any output if that matters)
if ...
{
execute :input "test input" "test";
}
Only thing still unsolved is my other thread don't know why the exectued
script has no filesystem access? (like "touch /tmp/test" ignored no error)
Also is the only different between direct and socket execute that with
socket I can run the script with more restricted owner and permissions?
Are there other differences?
