Am I correct: pigeonhole now wants the symlink to the filter file to use an absolute path instead of the relative paths we had?

i.e.) sieve-filterfile@ -> /home/mail/domain/user@domain/roundcube.sieve
instead of sieve-filterfile@ -> roundcube.sieve

Dovecot logs these:

dovecot: managesieve(u...@domain.org): Warning: sieve-storage: Active sieve 
script symlink /home/mail/domain.org/u...@domain.org/sieve-filterfile is 
broken: invalid/unknown path to storage (points to roundcube.sieve).

and the debug log:

Jul 29 15:37:59 managesieve(u...@domain.org): Debug: sieve: Pigeonhole version 
0.4.3 initializing
Jul 29 15:37:59 managesieve(u...@domain.org): Debug: sieve: include: 
sieve_global_dir is not set; it is currently not possible to include `:global' 
scripts.
Jul 29 15:37:59 managesieve(u...@domain.org): Debug: sieve-storage: using 
active sieve script path: /home/mail/domain.org/u...@domain.org/sieve-filterfile
Jul 29 15:37:59 managesieve(u...@domain.org): Debug: sieve-storage: using sieve 
script storage directory: /home/mail/domain.org/u...@domain.org/
Jul 29 15:37:59 managesieve(u...@domain.org): Debug: sieve-storage: using 
permissions from /home/mail/domain.org/u...@domain.org/: mode=0700 gid=-1
Jul 29 15:37:59 managesieve(u...@domain.org): Debug: sieve-storage: relative 
path to sieve storage in active link:

I found if I manually delete a symlink and replace it using the full path:

 sieve-filterfile -> /home/mail/domain.org/u...@domain.org/roundcube.sieve

then everybody is happy. So I'm looking to make a configuration change (and then change all existing symlinks.) I just wanted to check with the list about the two settings we return as part of the user_query:

 concat(homedir, maildir, 'sieve-filterfile') as sieve,
 concat(homedir,maildir) as sieve_dir

In testing it seems like changing 'sieve' to return not the whole path but just the link name, actuall causes pigeonhole to properly make the symlink with full path! Does this seem right?

FreeBSD (8.4)
dovecot-pigeonhole (0.4.3_1)
dovecot2 (2.2.13_3)


 Benjamin

Reply via email to