On Die, 2014-06-10 at 11:04 -0400, Chris Young wrote: > Gmail doesn't let me filter on message headers so I've updated my filter as > follows
One more reason not to use it;-) [...] > On Tue, Jun 10, 2014 at 10:51 AM, Koenraad Lelong < > dove...@ace-electronics.be> wrote: [...] > > Just wanted to ask what happened to "[Dovecot]" when I saw this mail. > > Could you tell me how to find the List_ID ? I looked at the raw mail, but I > > didn't find it : [...] > > Reply-To: Dovecot Mailing List <dovecot@dovecot.org> You could use that header (which actually should better be gone because reply-to munging considered harmful) or some other header field with "dovecot" somewhere. FTR: I find ---- snip ---- List-Id: Dovecot Mailing List <dovecot.dovecot.org> List-Unsubscribe: <http://dovecot.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/dovecot>, <mailto:dovecot-requ...@dovecot.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <http://dovecot.org/pipermail/dovecot/> List-Post: <mailto:dovecot@dovecot.org> List-Help: <mailto:dovecot-requ...@dovecot.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <http://dovecot.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dovecot>, <mailto:dovecot-requ...@dovecot.org?subject=subscribe> ---- snip ---- in every mail header (=> RFC-2919). Is someone filtering headers on your side or the MUA just not displaying really all of them? [...] > > Another thing I'm wondering about is if I should allow text/html parts, = > > because removing them will also break the DKIM signatures. Or mainly I'd = > > like to allow only multipart/alternative with text/plain + text/html, = FWIW text/html is actually overrated and - essentially - superfluous. Additionally it makes it even easier to fool the average user. Kind regards, Bernd -- Bernd Petrovitsch Email: be...@sysprog.at
