On -10.01.-28163 20:59, Reindl Harald wrote:
> Am 23.05.2014 17:51, schrieb Jochen Bern:
>> So the specific *LEGAL REQUIREMENTS* I gave as an example don't apply to
>> your servers/organization/country/whatever? Good for you. Now how about
>> we wait for Dmitry to tell us whether or not *he* needs the solution to
>> *his* problem to address such scenarios?
>
> which legal requirements?
Legal requirements like, for example, these German ones:
http://www.recht-im-internet.de/themen/archivierung.htm
Note that the legalese addresses users acting in the name of a company,
*regardless* of what infrastructure they're using to do so.
> user of domain1.example.com must not use the MTA of domain2.example.com
> for sending mails with his domain1.example.com
>
> user of domain2.example.com must not use the MTA of domain1.example.com
> for sending mails with his domain2.example.com
>
> there is nothing between - period
I asked Dmitry whether users of his domain1 picking up the habit of
sending e-mail (on domain1 matters) through some domain2 - in a way
that's perfectly acceptable on the *technical* plane you're so obsessed
about - and thus bypassing the automatic copy he's trying to set up on
domain1's servers is a development he can accept. For me, it would *not*
be, for reasons that are non-technical but nonetheless binding.
Regards,
J. Bern
--
*NEU* - NEC IT-Infrastruktur-Produkte im <http://www.linworks-shop.de/>:
Server--Storage--Virtualisierung--Management SW--Passion for Performance
Jochen Bern, Systemingenieur --- LINworks GmbH <http://www.LINworks.de/>
Postfach 100121, 64201 Darmstadt | Robert-Koch-Str. 9, 64331 Weiterstadt
PGP (1024D/4096g) FP = D18B 41B1 16C0 11BA 7F8C DCF7 E1D5 FAF4 444E 1C27
Tel. +49 6151 9067-231, Zentr. -0, Fax -299 - Amtsg. Darmstadt HRB 85202
Unternehmenssitz Weiterstadt, Geschäftsführer Metin Dogan, Oliver Michel
