Am 13.05.2014 19:58, schrieb Maciej Uhlig: > May I ask to add Return-Path: some meaningful header line to sieve sent > mail headers in vacation message? Now the header line isn't generated at > all and the effect is as follows: > > on receiving MTA: > > 2014-05-09T15:04:32+02:00 host/ip postfix/qmgr[2408]: 41F2F6024E: > from=<>, size=900, nrcpt=1 (queue active) > > in received mail body: > > Return-Path: <>
which is correct > Would be nice to get: > > Return-Path: <user@domain> > > Copy of From: header line could be sufficient which is completly insane in case you don't log every single vacation and stop after the first one to the same address guess what happens if two persons have a vacation resonder at the same time and one of them sends a mail - the faster server with more storage will win that battle may i ask to read some RFC's and consider the impact of sloppy proposals if one would make them real?
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
