On Sat, 19 Apr 2014 09:40:07 +0200 Reindl Harald <h.rei...@thelounge.net> wrote:
> it is working, it is working as good as it can and if you compare the > costs of 130 € for 3 years with support calls because self signed > certificates and do a *real harm* by train ordinary users to ignore > warnings just guess which way works > > honestly if i connect to a server owned by a company coming > with a self-signed certificate without got told so before > i get alarmed that they may not be trustworthy because if they > save the little money for the cert i may assume they save money > on other important things too Honestly, with your awareness of "as good as it can" wouldn't it be fair to tell people that they spend millions all over the planet for something that is not working? How can you expect the situation to get any better if you cover the problem by buying certs only for the reason to avoid warnings that are useless anyways? You know things go wrong and still do support it. I think one should have learned in the after-Snowden-era where this leads to. -- Regards, Stephan
