[ Reply-To set: let's not make this another pointless thread ] On Mon, Oct 21, 2013 at 03:37:10PM +0200, Reindl Harald wrote: > Am 21.10.2013 15:30, schrieb Charles Marcus: > > Thanks Steffen... > > > > I kill-filed Reindl a while back due to his abusive, arrogant > > nature... > > what was absusive in this thread?
I think you misunderstand. Charles was actually paying you a partial compliment. He was not saying that your response was abusive. He was saying that you actually seem to have a clue most of the time. FWIW I agree on both counts. You tend to get abusive sometimes, but your technical accuracy is very good. > and the abusive reply to you in the following thread was > well deserved after your "prove it" > http://dovecot.org/list/dovecot/2013-February/088587.html The idea that abuse is "well deserved" could be the origin of your difficulty in fitting in with online technical communities. There's really nothing worth getting angry over. If I think someone has been rude to me, my best response is no response. I haven't seen that from you. You never let anything pass. You'll probably ignore my Reply-To: header and reply to this. > > Too bad - I held off for a long time, because he does actually > > seem to have a clue most of the time. > > because i read docs, not only for dovecot, for a lot of other > server software far away from mail and the underlying RFC's too Yes, that is obvious. You have a lot to contribute. Too bad we can only get that at a price that many posters consider too high. Sincere best wishes to you. EOT. -- http://rob0.nodns4.us/ -- system administration and consulting Offlist GMX mail is seen only if "/dev/rob0" is in the Subject:
