>>Quoting azurIt <azu...@pobox.sk>:
>>
>>> i'm using Dovecot 2.1.7 (Debian Wheezy) and output from LIST command
>>> looks strange:
>>>
>>> C: 4 LIST () "" (INBOX INBOX.Karantena INBOX.Spam) RETURN (STATUS (UNSEEN))
>>> S: * LIST () "." "INBOX"
>>> S: * LIST () "." "INBOX.Karantena"
>>> S: * STATUS "INBOX.Karantena" (UNSEEN 0)
>>> S: * LIST () "." "INBOX.Spam"
>>> S: * STATUS "INBOX.Spam" (UNSEEN 0)
>>> S: 4 OK List completed.
>>>
>>> The UNSEEN information for INBOX is completely missing. It is
>>> correct behavior?
>>
>>No. RFC 5819 [2]:
>>
>>"For each selectable mailbox matching the list pattern and selection
>>options, the server MUST return an untagged LIST response followed by
>>an untagged STATUS response containing the information requested in
>>the STATUS return option."
>>
>>INBOX matches the list pattern (It is explicitly contained in the
>>search list) and the selection options (which is empty), so the server
>>MUST return both a LIST response -AND- a STATUS response.
>>
>>2.1.10 changelog has this cryptic entry:
>> - imap: Various fixes to listing mailboxes.
>>
>>Maybe that is what fixed things (I don't see this behavior in 2.2.6).
>>
>>michael
>>
>
>
>
>
>
>Ok, i have this in my config:
>
>namespace inbox {
> prefix = INBOX.
> separator = .
> inbox = yes
> list = yes
>}
>
>Based on migration instructions from here:
>http://wiki2.dovecot.org/Migration/Courier
>
>and here:
>http://wiki2.dovecot.org/Namespaces
>
>Difference is that second page is using namespace 'inbox' and first not. I
>tried both and the second was working ok while first was doing problems in
>IMAP clients (it puts folder tree to different location than it was with
>Courier).
>
>The problem with LIST command disappears when i comment out line "prefix =
>INBOX.". Any hints? Thank you.
>
>azur
Really no one?
