On 8.8.2013, at 12.07, Thomas Leuxner <t...@leuxner.net> wrote:

> Let me say this is a rather cosmetic issue, but it appears with the latest 
> commits (around 2.2.5 release) the scheme of 'Received' headers has changed 
> for LMTP:

Thanks. I thought I found all such occurrences, but looks like I missed that 
one for some reason. Fixed: http://hg.dovecot.org/dovecot-2.2/rev/9aa9944bd96e

> 1) Inet socket:
> Return-Path: <dfn-adv-boun...@dfn-cert.de>
> Delivered-To: <t...@leuxner.net>
> Received: from spectre.leuxner.net ([188.138.0.199])
>       by spectre.leuxner.net (Dovecot) with LMTP id 8AkXDF5cA1LvDgAAZ53dLw
>       for <t...@leuxner.net>; Thu, 08 Aug 2013 10:52:46 +0200
> 
> 2) UNIX socket:
> Return-Path: <dfn-adv-boun...@dfn-cert.de>
> Delivered-To: <t...@leuxner.net>
> Received: from spectre.leuxner.net ([])
>       by spectre.leuxner.net (Dovecot) with LMTP id q8WuGflcA1I3DwAAZ53dLw
>       for <t...@leuxner.net>; Thu, 08 Aug 2013 10:55:21 +0200
> 
> 3) Old (Pre 2.2.5) build, UNIX socket:
> Return-Path: <dfn-adv-boun...@dfn-cert.de>
> Delivered-To: <t...@leuxner.net>
> Received: from spectre.leuxner.net
>       by spectre.leuxner.net (Dovecot) with LMTP id 8NiKKX0h+lFRIAAAZ53dLw
>       for <t...@leuxner.net>; Thu, 01 Aug 2013 10:51:09 +0200
> 
> While it probably should resolve the FQDN in 1) (Postfix does), not sure what 
> it should do with a UNIX socket in 2). Previously as shown in 3) it had none 
> of it...
> 
> Thomas

Reply via email to