Searching my mailboxes for something and noticed this in my spam bucket...

On 2013-05-10 11:35 AM, Reindl Harald <h.rei...@thelounge.net> wrote:
Am 10.05.2013 17:17, schrieb Charles Marcus:
On 2013-05-10 10:37 AM, Stephan Bosch <step...@rename-it.nl> wrote:
Ehhh.. no :) It implements the server-side SMTP AUTH, so that your MTA doesn't 
have to any more. So the client will authenticate to Dovecot rather than to the 
regular MTA/MSA. But, again, this is a rather trivial matter and not the main 
reason for building this proxy.

Ok... so, will this make it easier to add client side sasl support to dovecots 
dovecot-sasl implementation to eliminate the need for postfix+dovecot systems 
to continue to rely on cyrus-sasl for MTA client side sasl support?

[root@srv-rhsoft:~]$ postconf -n | grep dovecot
smtpd_sasl_type = dovecot

dovecot.conf:
service auth {
   unix_listener /var/spool/postfix/private/auth {
   mode                         = 0660
   user                         = postfix
   group                        = postfix
  }
}

and any dovecot user works the same way and with the same
auth-mechs with postfix - in use here since 2009

What does that have to do with providing MTA CLIENT-side SASL_AUTH support?

Do you not know the difference between smtpD_sasl and smtP_sasl?

Server-side = smtpd

Client-side = smtp

Currently the only way postfix can perform CLIENT-side sasl_auth is with cyrus-sasl, because dovecot_sasl doesn't support it, and never has.

any in this case means rally any like also below to get rid
of problems with legacy client-configs of a old server which
supported % instead of @, now both works equal as username

auth_username_translation = 
%@AaBbCcDdEeFfGgHhIiJjKkLlMmNnOoPpQqRrSsTtUuVvWwXxYyZz

No clue what you're talking about here...

Reply via email to