On 16.4.2013, at 19.30, l...@airstreamcomm.net wrote: > On 4/15/13 11:16 AM, Timo Sirainen wrote: >> On 15.4.2013, at 18.55, l...@airstreamcomm.net wrote: >> >>> Does the new obox plugin support any of the open source object storage >>> systems such as openstack, glusterfs, or ceph? From your store site it >>> does not appear so. >> Glusterfs isn't really object storage (unless they've changed since I last >> looked at them), and it already more or less works with Dovecot using the >> existing mailbox formats. Except last I heard it still caused index file >> corruption. >> >> Openstack Swift support is coming. There's a half-working version of it >> already, would need just a day or two to finish it up. >> >> I haven't looked at Ceph closely yet, but it would be nice to support it as >> well. >> >> obox can also be used with a regular POSIX filesystem, although it loses the >> prefetching capabilities then. So it could be used with e.g. Glusterfs or >> NFS to provide an efficient local cache. I've also thought about trying out >> if prefetching could be done by creating new "diskio" processes with a ton >> of threads doing the actual disk I/O. >> >> > > Timo, Riak CS is S3 compatible. Just curious if you have tested with Riak CS > (especially the multi-data center implementation).
I've only tested it against Amazon S3. But if it's fully API compatible, I don't see why it wouldn't work..
