On 20 March 2013 10:54, Timo Sirainen <t...@iki.fi> wrote: > On Wed, 2013-03-20 at 10:40 +0000, Damien Churchill wrote: >> On 20 March 2013 10:39, Timo Sirainen <t...@iki.fi> wrote: >> > On Wed, 2013-03-20 at 10:29 +0000, Damien Churchill wrote: >> > >> >> I've been messing about with this and I think a similar configuration >> >> format to the sql dict driver would be handy, although I imagine the >> >> same could also be achieved with just lots of uri arguments. Mongo >> >> isn't really a key/value store so you'd want to be able to specify >> >> fields within the document to query upon/fetch. >> >> >> >> I'm still getting to grips with the architecture of things so not >> >> entirely sure what the best course of action would be here. If using >> >> the map style config would be desirable then creating some shared >> >> parser that sql and mongodb can use would be good. >> > >> > I've been planning on having one generic dict sql-like configuration for >> > all dict backends, so you could map different dict paths to different >> > backends. So the idea is good, but probably quite a lot of work. >> > >> >> Would it not be just some bastardised version of dict-sql-settings? > > I guess you could do that for now. The grand plans of how to put > everything nicely together can wait. :) >
For now I think I can get away with just tacking on uri arguments. Seems silly duplicating effort, although if you'd like me to give it a shot I'm happy to do so!
