On Sun, 17 Mar 2013 17:11:18 +0000 Daniel articulated: > First of all the wiki articles on dovecots site are poorly written > compared to apache and postfix. That is what I mean by lack luster > the error logging is lack luster as it doesn't specify the file or > the line error is on like many very well supported applications like > apache and postfix and that makes dovecot not very user friendly. I > owe no one an apology for stating my opinion and I have over 10 years > of using open source software and dovecot is the application that I > have used that given me such headache and grief to the point I have > given up on this learning experience.
First of all, I don't think any sane person would argue that the Dovecot documentation is in a league with Postfix or even Apache. For that matter, I know of no other open source software that has documentation as detailed as Postfix. Try deciphering the OpenSSL documentation sometime. However, I think it is obvious that the poster was simply "venting" his frustrations out on a convenient audience. The logging could be "tightened" up and the documentation does need work. With that said, I think we can put this matter to bed. Nothing is going to come from it so why waste time arguing over it. -- Jerry ♔ Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored. Please do not ignore the Reply-To header. __________________________________________________________________
