Am 19.09.2012 14:53, schrieb Jost Krieger: > On Tue 18 Sep 2012 07:47:09 PM GMT, Robert Schetterer wrote: > >> some allready existing way is i.e >> with milter and postfix tagged spam get in hold queue for i.e human >> admin investigate, or some quarantaine with amavis > > Human admin is not a good idea if you have 50000 users :-) > Quarantine's a possibility, but that's taking it out of "Mail" and adds > complexity.
as ever ,this is different in different places specially Quarantine is wide used > >> for sure there are benefits getting dovecot involved in spam tagging >> but i would leave spam tagging to the mailserver in first way and >> deliver it to Junk folder by global sieve rule with giving more quota or >> ignoring Quota to Junk folder, but i see this isnt the same what you >> might wanna goal > > That's just what we want to do, *but* although it's in the Wiki I don't > think it a good idea to *raise* the limit for the junk folder if you > *deliver* to it. It's somewhat ok if you move mail there and someone > picks it up (we do that with a different folder). But on delivery it > means at some point you can receive spam but no real messages. Not nice. > > "ignore" may work if it does what I think (never even count bytes and > messages in this folder) but it is open to abuse ... there is no good or evil to this case, its a design question which may change in different places,, the abuse case might be acceptable, as the Junk folder i.e is imap special used autoconfigured and has auto empty feature, i give 50 mb plus quota on Junk folder and delete mail older then 3 month there > > Yours > Jost Krieger > -- Best Regards MfG Robert Schetterer
