Angel L. Mateo <ama...@um.es> wrote: > El 25/08/12 09:23, Timo Sirainen escribió: >> On 25.8.2012, at 1.49, Sven Hartge wrote: >> >>>> How about just disabling the quota enforcing and doing a nightly run >>>> of some type of enforcing (sending notification email and/or disabling >>>> new mail delivery until user has more quota again)? >>> >>> As a last resort, yes. If possible, I'd like to keep the feedback about >>> mailbox size as direct as possible. >>> >>> Disabling an account only once per night might be acceptable, but the >>> reenabling of the account, once a user has freed some space, has to be >>> instant or I would get constant complains from the users (the ones with >>> the biggest mailboxes being the professors, which can be quite the pain >>> to work with, if they believe they don't get what they think they are >>> entitled to get).
>> You can use quota warning scripts to send warnings and enable account >> instantly when it goes under 100%. >> > But, if you still use quota, you are still counting deleted messages > in the quota. Aren't you? Quota would be noenforcing. So the users still sees "105% of quota used" but this does not result in any mail bouncing at once. Grüße, Sven. -- Sigmentation fault. Core dumped.
