On 18.8.2012, at 0.12, Lutz Preßler wrote: >>> inthread refs younger 604800 >>> >>> This works as expected for the first time. But later on, also older >>> messages/ >>> threads are included until I delete the virtual/.week/dovecot.index*. >> >> I know there are problems related to this with INTHREAD, but they aren't >> very easy to solve and for now I've more important things to do.. If it >> seemed to work before, it was due to luck or due to some bug causing an >> unnecessary index rebuild. You could set :INDEX=MEMORY to work around >> this, but I don't know how much worse the performance would become. Or >> you could just manually delete the virtual indexes once a week. > Situation with latest 2.1 is unchanged. But maybe it's easier to fix/ > enhance now? Any estimate how much effort it would be?
Just about the same amount of work I think. I haven't really looked at virtual plugin for a while, so I can't easily say how much work it would be. But my guess is that it wouldn't be easy.