always work very well. what's wrong?Fixed: http://hg.dovecot.org/dovecot-2.1/rev/4ce1f9649592
Thanks. so - my post actually got right. sorry for repost! just got this delayed!
Anyway, fts-lucene backend works better than fts-squat.
Better in what respect?less than a second (when disk I/O was needed) fulltext search over 10000 mails doesn't look bad :)
