On 16/03/2012 15:45, Charles Marcus wrote:
On 2012-03-16 11:22 AM, Ed W <li...@wildgooses.com> wrote:
If the answer is that he will write a Z-Push/Activesync module for SOGo
then I'm all ears! I have been watching SOGo for some time and the main
thing I would miss is that every phone I have ever owned has largely
limited/broken Funambol based sync and annoyingly working Activesync
capability (I own a stream of Nokias...). It seems that although I
don't like it, I need activesync support if I want my contacts/calendar
on my phone... (I think I can do caldav on some of them, but not cardav
on my N9)
While I agree it would be nice, why not just switch to a supported
phone and be done with it? ;)
When we roll out SOGo, we'll only be supporting the officially
supported mobile clients (android, iphone/ipad, blackberry and windows
mobile)...
That implies you will be using cardav/caldav on those phones? I thought
Android support was quite weak for those?
I definitely don't like the idea of supporting activesync, but it seems
like the only widely supported solution to pushing calendar and contacts
updates to clients? Caldav gets you part of the way there, but cardav
seems badly supported and there is no push support with either...
Out of curiousity, what kind of performance are you getting out of the
web interface and any tricks you used to improve "perceived"
performance? My quick testing gave something circa 150-200ms response
times from SOGo (forget exactly now) and as a result it was perceivable
and just very slightly laggy (versus a desktop mail program!!). I get
slightly better perceived performance from Roundcube (which also seems
more amenable to building extension plugins)
Seems a bit of a surprise that a compiled language delivers results
slightly less quickly than PHP... Did you find any magic knobs to twist
to get performance up there with gmail?
Cheers
Ed W
