Am 22.09.2011 16:42, schrieb dove...@lists.grepular.com: > On 22/09/11 15:39, Rick Romero wrote: > >>>> There are additional 'non-official' ClamAV signatures that are meant >>>> to detect phishing attempts. >>>> They do work, but aren't perfect. >>> >>> Got a link? Or are you thinking of the SaneSecurity Signatures? >> >> Yep. The SaneSecurity Sigs. > > We do use ClamAV+SaneSecurity on incoming email, but these are *very* > targetted phishing attacks, and lots of them manage to get through. The > Kochi application that I brought up sits on the *outgoing* mail routers > and prevents people sending out their login details once they've been > tricked. >
yes youre right, after all this isnt really dovecot related wasnt the orginal topic about brute force pop/imap attack ? -- Best Regards MfG Robert Schetterer Germany/Munich/Bavaria
