Timo, 2011/8/24 Timo Sirainen <t...@iki.fi>: > I remember listescape had problems with ACLs, and that it wasn't really > possible to solve those bugs without major changes. The good news though is > that those major changes are done in v2.1 where it should work.
Ok, I would avoid using maildir++ layout with listescape for now. I confirmed that it could support folder names including dots without listescape by using LAYOUT=fs. > Also you could make FS layout almost reserved-folder-name free by adding e.g. > :DIRNAME=Mails to your mail_location. Now the only reserved name is "Mails", > and you can of course use any other name that users are highly unlikely to > use (and remember that folder names are case sensitive). Yes, I've learnt about DIRNAME from the dovecot wiki. Currently that config could be the best for LAYOUT=fs. Thank you for the valuable information and suggestion! > Seome day I'm hoping to add yet another option that mailbox names wouldn't be > used in filenames at all, but rather their GUIDs. Good. Looking forward to seeing it. I also expect some of mailbox migration tools to be available :-) (dsync can do it?). Regards, -- YAEGASHI Takeshi <yaega...@debian.org>
