On 9.4.2011, at 13.41, Алексей Сундуков wrote: > Ok, but if I write my own MUA application? If different MUA use it's > own encoding format I think it's bad, very very bad way. Because > application can't decode keywords written by another application.
Yeah, it sucks. > Can someone known a solution to this problem? No. You could try proposing a standard though. http://www.washington.edu/imap/lists/imap-protocol.html > 2011/4/9 Michael M Slusarz <slus...@curecanti.org>: >> Quoting Алексей Сундуков <public-m...@alekciy.ru>: >> >>> But I can't understand what encoding use dovecot for keywords? I set >>> "тест" (number 5) keyword: >>> >>> cat dovecot-keywords >>> 0 &bcienqrbbeiepgqybdaetw-_&bdwenqrcbdoema- >>> 1 test >>> 2 $label1 >>> 3 $label2 >>> 4 $label3 >>> 5 &beienqq6beeeqg- >>> >>> but "&beienqq6beeeqg-" do not convert to "тест". Why? >> >> Because only mailboxes are encoded in Modified UTF-7. There is no >> equivalent encoding for keywords. Keywords are *not* meant to be directly >> viewable by an end-user. Converting between a keyword and the >> representation displayed to the user is the job of the MUA. >> >> michael >> >> >
