On Mon, 2011-01-10 at 14:08 +0100, Michal Hlavinka wrote: > On Tuesday, January 04, 2011 00:47:16 Timo Sirainen wrote: > > On 3.1.2011, at 19.15, Michal Hlavinka wrote: > > > Shouldn't mkdir and chown make together a transaction? When it fails just > > > for first time, it confuses some admins (this is the reason why I'm > > > getting complains (bug reports) just because missing/wrong > > > configuration). I think it a) should work even for first connection > > > (ignore chown failure) or b)it should not work for following connection, > > > so the behavior should be more consistent. > > > I think a) is better for lazy admins, but b) is more correct, because other > way it's (a little bit) harder to find out this error - having wrong > permissions in situations when group is really required.
I implemented a) a while ago.
