> > i've actually been reading on ocfs2 and it looks quite promising. According > to this presentation: > > > http://www.gpaterno.com/publications/2010/dublin_ossbarcamp_2010_fs_comparison.pdf > > ocfs2 seems to work quite well with lots of small files (typical of > maildir). I'm guessing that since ocfs2 reboot a system automatically, it > doesn't require any additional fencing? >
I did not see that on my tests, chmod take really long, as to rm files is even longer. how many users are we talking about ? And we are not using any fence device with the ocfs2 because it reboots when anything goes wrong. []'sf.rique On Fri, Jan 14, 2011 at 9:36 AM, Ed W <li...@wildgooses.com> wrote: > Where are all the glusterfs users in this thread... There are at least a > couple of folks here using such a system? Any comments on how it's working > out for you? > > Ed W >
