On 28-12-10 16:07, David Ford wrote:
dovecot, the whole point of his original email is to return a useful
error code for the purpose of scripting. :) always returning 0 for both
valid and invalid usernames isn't helpful
-d
OK,
But the original mail show an invalid use of the doveadm command
'doveadm user', which correctly produced a return-value of '1'
And a correclty formed command 'doveadm user foo', which correctly
returned '0'
At the end of 'man doveadm-user' it says:
"REPORTING BUGS
Report bugs, including doveconf -n output, to the Dovecot
Mailing List <dovecot@dovecot.org>."
While i think this is a change-request, and not a bug, i still wonder
what the output of 'dovecot -n' will help in this case ;-)
--
Luuk
