Am 05.11.2010 15:15, schrieb Ralf Hildebrandt: > * Charles Marcus <cmar...@media-brokers.com>: >> On 2010-11-05 10:05 AM, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote: >>> * Charles Marcus <cmar...@media-brokers.com>: >>> >>>> Hmmm... maybe dovecot 2.0 is doing something different from 1.2 that >>>> causes your *live* clamdscan at delivery time to produce the heavier >>>> load... >>> >>> Clamdscan is not running at delivery time on that box, it's running on >>> another machine. >> >> ?? > > Yes, on the gateway which all mails go through > >> On 2010-11-05 8:56 AM, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote: >>> * David Ford <da...@blue-labs.org>: >>>> why don't you run clamdscan on delivery? >>> I do. >> >> You plainly state that you *do* run clamdscan on delivery... > > Not on this machine. >
Hi Ralph , ia still not clear about your problem i understand that you do something with clam and there is difference between dovocot versions , am i right ? is this clamscan from amavis or at cron etc? i use it with milter with latest 2.06 havent seen great performance problems yet, but i only have dove 1.0 to compare on a total different machine at last what makes you wonder about your scans? -- Best Regards MfG Robert Schetterer Germany/Munich/Bavaria
