On 9/30/2010 7:28 AM, Charles Marcus wrote:
On 2010-09-30 7:38 AM, Cor Bosman wrote:
Charles wrote:
Timo, can you at least clarify this - my understanding is that the
problem here is not inherent to dovecot, but to NFS caching, and that
dovecot is no more or less prone to having problems than any other
imap/pop3 server?
That is correct. Except that many other imap/pop servers do not
implement a message index to increase performance. The problem lies
in the index, not in the messages themselves.
Right, I knew that, just wasn't clear...
You can turn off the index completely, and then you'll be just as
slow as any other imap server and wont ever see this problem.
But we're talking strictly POP3 here, so indexes aren't useful (and
therefor can be disabled completely if all you are using dovecot for is
as a POP3 server) anyway, right?
Just to clarify, we are talking strictly pop3 w/maildir. Indexing is
quite useful for pop3 w/mbox.
Ken
Pacific.Net
As for IMAP, I think Timo also made it clear that if you weren't using
the dovecot LDA+index updating, or if the indexes weren't stored on NFS,
then IMAP didn't suffer the problem/issue as well... ?
I'm just glad I don't have to use NFS, so I'm asking just for the sake
of knowing (and in case I ever do need to use NFS)... :)
--
Ken Anderson
Pacific Internet - http://www.pacific.net
