On Tue, 2010-08-31 at 19:57 +0200, Stephan Schulz wrote: > What is speaking > agains adding the -lgcc_s if configure finds itself on Solaris?
Because it seems like unnecessary workaround. I haven't heard anyone else complain about this than you in the recent years (other than I guess the one other person whose mail you linked to). I'd at least want to understand why this isn't a problem for all Solaris users. Can you compile *anything* without -lgcc_s?
