On Wed, 2010-08-04 at 12:50 +0200, A.L.E.C wrote: > On 04.08.2010 12:25, Craig Whitmore wrote: > > > Looking at the RFC.. and if dovecot is doing this then its going against > > the RFC and doing it wrong. As it says "This listing of capabilities is > > not dependent upon connection state or user." > > > > http://tools.ietf.org/search/rfc1730#section-6.1.1 > > http://tools.ietf.org/search/rfc2060#section-6.1.1 > > Timo will know better. Just want to say, that this sentence has been > removed in RFC3501.
Sorry.. I didn't go far enough forward :-) Thanks >
