On 07/30/2010 09:01 AM Odhiambo Washington wrote: > On Thu, Jul 29, 2010 at 9:28 PM, Pascal Volk < > user+dove...@localhost.localdomain.org<user%2bdove...@localhost.localdomain.org> >> wrote: >> When you don't want to test SIS, don't enable it. Or use the SIS-less >> code from: http://hg.dovecot.org/dovecot-2.0 > > I did not enable SIS at all. Do you mean that setting mail_location = > mdbox... enables it? I did not think so. I just thought I was using the > matured dbox facility, and in my mind I was clear I wasn't doing anything > SIS related, honestly;) > Now, assume that I haven't heard of SIS, but I am a mad guy who just decided > to use the mercurial code that has SIS, can I just use mdbox or sdbox > without necessarily invoking the anger of SIS? What options do I need in > mail_location for just that? > I believe I already got what it takes on the MTA side, from the wiki.
But you are using the code from the SIS-enabled repo. SIS code affects also multi and single dbox code. If you don't want to test SIS related things, but would prefer mdbox over sdbox, so I'll repeat myself: Use the SIS-less code from: http://hg.dovecot.org/dovecot-2.0. (In your first mail you mentioned that you are using the code from the other repo.) > This is the exim transport that I use. It works with the RC3 but not the > SIS-ised Dovecot. > > > dovecot_virtual_delivery: > driver = pipe > return_output > command = /opt/dovecot2/libexec/dovecot/deliver -d $local_p...@$domain -f > $sender_address > message_prefix = > message_suffix = > delivery_date_add > envelope_to_add > return_path_add > log_output > user = mailnull > temp_errors = 64 : 69 : 70: 71 : 72 : 73 : 74 : 75 : 78 See if that settings work again after switching back to SIS-less Dovecot 2.0 code. Regards, Pascal -- The trapper recommends today: cafebabe.1021...@localdomain.org
