On Wed, 2010-07-14 at 01:39 -0700, Brandon Davidson wrote: > I've got a couple more issues with the doveadm director interface: > > 1) If I use "doveadm director remove" to disable a host with active users, > the director seems to lose track of users mapped to that host.
Yes, that's what it was intended to do. > I guess I > would expect it to tear down any active sessions by killing the login > proxies, Hmh.. I guess that would be nice, but also a bit annoying to do. It would require each login process to have a connection to director process, and currently there's no such connection (except for the notify fifo, but that's wrong way). > like I'd done 'doveadm direct add HOSTNAME 0 && doveadm director > flush HOSTNAME' before removing it? But that does almost the same thing as remove. > 2) "doveadm director flush" returns the wrong usage: Fixed. > 3) "doveadm director flush" all breaks the ring: Fixed.
