On Fri, May 28, 2010 at 17:30, Charles Marcus <cmar...@media-brokers.com> wrote: > On 2010-05-28 5:01 PM, Phil Howard wrote: >> On Fri, May 28, 2010 at 16:53, Charles Marcus wrote: >>> The whole purpose of the -n output is to provide clean, easy to read >>> *settings* as seen by postfix (as opposed to comments that are meant for >>> people). > >> So you are saying that this is not meant for people? > > <sigh> yeah, so I worded it badly... > > Of course it is meant for people, but it is meant to show only the bare > minimum of what postfix sees as the settings. It is left up to you, the > sys admin, to be able to interpret the data as presented, bearing in > mind all caveats (ie, that last setting wins)...
And that caveat was something I was not aware of, as it is an usual method.
