Axel,

On 5/30/10 3:39 AM, "Axel Thimm" <axel.th...@atrpms.net> wrote:
> 
> Now it is more consistent and looks like a change between 4.1.2 and
> 4.4.1.
> 
> Maybe in the older gcc -std=gnu99 didn't set __USE_ISOC99 and thus the
> missing constants were not defined?

If I '%define optflags -std=gnu99' in the spec it builds just fine, so I
don't think it's a compiler problem. Maybe a libtool issue?

-Brad

Reply via email to