On 2010-05-22 4:35 AM, Timo Sirainen wrote: > On 20.5.2010, at 21.59, Charles Marcus wrote: >> Hmmm... postfix handles this by simply letting the last one 'win', which >> seems like a reasonable way to handle that. >> >> Any chance 2.0 could work the same way? This way I could keep all of my >> settings in a separate file, and then include them in the main file, and >> I'd be sure that my custom settings overrode any of the defaults.
> That's how Dovecot works too, <sigh> I did test this real quick before posting, but I goofed - what I did was add 'protocols = pop' to the bottom, where above it was 'protocols = imaps' - and of course dovecot -n barfed since it should be pop3, not pop. Sorry for the noise - I haven't used POP in many many years, so gloss over anything POP related - I'm glad to see it is indeed working like this... :) -- Best regards, Charles
