On Fri, 2010-04-16 at 17:06 +0200, Thomas Hummel wrote: > On Fri, Apr 16, 2010 at 03:02:47PM +0300, Timo Sirainen wrote: > > > If you don't share control directory, keywords can get more or less > > broken because different users have different mappings for maildir > > char<->keyword name. So you should share the control directory. > > > > > [Note : isn't it the same event with no shared mailboxes but with one > > > user using several clients ?] > > > > Exactly. Probably not much of a problem. > > Why not much of a problem ?
Because I haven't yet heard complains about this from people? > Sure there will be only one mapping but cannot the > keyword meaning be different between different user agent of even the same > user > ? Can't we end up in a message tagged as "important" in a client being tagged > as > "personnal" in another client ? Dunno. There are two possibilities here: a) Client uses "Important" and "Personal" keywords -> no problem here. b) Client 1 uses $Label1 keyword to mean "Important", while client 2 uses $Label1 to mean "Personal". I know TB used to use $Label* keywords. I don't know if it still does. I don't know if any other client maps them to conflicting names.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
