On Sun, 2010-02-21 at 07:26 +0100, Thomas Leuxner wrote: > Am 21.02.2010 um 07:16 schrieb Timo Sirainen: > > > Yes, that's intentional. imaps isn't a protocol. > > Thanks Timo. Has the specific logging option for the LDA been dropped? I see > it logging to 'info_log_path=' only.
What specific logging option for LDA?.. Seems to work exactly the same
as in v1.2:
protocol lda {
info_log_path = /tmp/deliver.log
}
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
