On Sun, 2010-02-14 at 19:48 +0000, Kārlis Repsons wrote: > On Sunday 14 February 2010 19:36:20 Timo Sirainen wrote: > > Squat: Supposed to be completely transparent, but I don't like its > > performance. The indexing speed is too slow. And it seems like the > > incremental indexing rebuilds the index too often. (I used to use it, > > but every time I wanted to do a search, it spent a few minutes on > > indexing, even when there hadn't been all that many new messages.) Needs > > a redesign some day. > Well, but how can its capabilities be accessed, for example, to > a) search only for full words, > b) search also for word parts?
You can't. It always searches substrings, just like IMAP RFC requires.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
