On 25.1.2010, at 21.30, Brandon Davidson wrote:
> Unfortunately we're currently using LDAP auth via PAM... so even if I
> could get the SQL and monitoring issues resolved, I think I'd have a
> hard time convincing my peers that adding a SQL server as a single point
> of failure was a good idea. If it could be set up to just fall back to
> using a local connection in the event of a SQL server outage, that might
> help things a bit. Anyone know how that might work?
Well, you can always fall back to LDAP if SQL isn't working.. Just something
like:
passdb sql {
..
}
passdb ldap {
..
}
