Dick Middleton wrote: > Hi, > > This topic has been discussed before e.g: > <snip /> > > Cherokee supports the clean and standard method of dealing with this > issue called Server Name Indication (SNI) that sends the name of the > virtual host during the TLS negotiation. > > <snip/> > > If Cherokee can do it why not dovecot? Is this something that is, or > could be, being considered? It does assume that TB3 and other mail > clients support SNI but whatever, I suspect that once TB3 is released > the subject will pop-up more frequently. > > I'm curious to know the latest thinking. > > Dick > >
>From the "Dovecot SSL Limitations" thread last week: Timo Sirainen wrote: > On Nov 30, 2009, at 4:32 PM, AllenJB wrote: > >> Possibly off-topic from what the OP wants, but couldn't TLS Server Name >> Indication (SNI) be used to overcome the single server certificate >> limitation? > > With Dovecot v2.0 and living in theoretical land, sure. >
