On Tue, 2009-10-20 at 17:34 +0200, Stephan Bosch wrote: > Peter Borg wrote: > > I find it really hard to believe that Gavin and I are the only ones to hit > > this issue. That said I've probably been hacking at this particular system > > too long and am missing something very obvious....! > > > You're definitely not the only one. Finding a good solution is difficult > however. The intention of this check within the vacation action is to > prevent spurious vacation responses to for example Bcc:'ed deliveries > (and perhaps multi-drop aliases).
For my own situation, I solved this issue entirely from the 'roundcube' webmail package. Help on the roundcubeforums site suggested changes to the 'sieverules' plugin so :addresses would always be included in a vacation rule. I extended this to the :from parameter. Also used roundcube's new_user_identity plugin to populate the primary identity of a 'ar-wbim' username with 'wim....@ourdomain.com' so that the :from and :addresses are using the canonical format Fairly ugly, but it works for us. I'll document the changes if I get a moment. Cheers, Gavin.
