"Frank Behrens" <fr...@ilse.behrens.de> wrote: > Andrzej Adam Filip <a...@onet.eu> wrote on 21 Oct 2009 20:02: >> Dovecot's design issues to consider are as follows: >> a) making dovecot support hash/btree/dbm maps for passwd/userdb >> [AFAIR Timo stated it is too complicated to be "cost effective" from >> his perspective] >> b) making dovecot support sendmail's "socket map" protocol for checking >> mailbox existence >> The simple protocol is described in semdmail's doc/op/op.me file >> http://www.sendmail.org/doc/sendmail-current/doc/op/op.pdf >> c) making dovecot support LMTP protocol via unix socket > > If I understand you right, this is a wish for virtual mailboxes, isn't > it? Regular systems users work without problems. What I want is only > the additional envelope receiver address available in dovecot-sieve. I > see see no problems in mailbox selection in sendmail and dovecot.
>From your perspective "socket map" support in dovecot may give a way to reject messages to "over quota" recipients in reply to "RCPT TO:". -- [pl>en: Andrew] Andrzej Adam Filip : a...@onet.eu You can't have everything. Where would you put it? -- Steven Wright
