On Tue, 2009-10-13 at 21:38 +0100, Ed W wrote: > Something I had been pondering recently (I started using a cell phone > with imap idle support), was a previous poster mentioning the huge > increase in battery life from turning off the radio for as long as > possible. It appears that just turning on the radio (wifi or 3G) > consumes much more energy than the transmitting of a few bytes of data > after it's on. In particular synchronising certain types of infrequent > transmissions may have a dramatic increase in battery life for mobile > devices - I'm thinking mainly of the NOOPs when the connection is idling > > Is this something that could be implemented with the current > architecture? Are there other types of application where synchronising > "stuff" happening to multiple connections from the same client could be > helpful?
No matter how many times I read the above, I've no idea what you're trying to ask. :) This seems like entirely a client-dependent issue and Dovecot can't much alter clients' behavior. Unless you're talking about running Dovecot on a cell phone?..
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part