On Seg, 2009-09-28 at 14:06 -0400, Timo Sirainen wrote: > On Mon, 2009-09-28 at 19:02 +0100, Ed W wrote: > > > Proxy servers are usually set between the webmail and the imap server. > > > > > > That's because webmails are a bitch regarding opening+closing > > > connections and so the proxy gets most of connection + auth + do > > > something + disconnect and keeps a limited pool of per user connections > > > to the imap servers that it re-uses. Proxies are usually installed on > > > the same servers that the webmail, with the webmail connecting to > > > 127.0.0.1:someport. > > > > > > > > > > That's what he was asking about, however, I don't think that dovecot's > > proxy does in fact do this for you? I believe > > Right, Dovecot doesn't do connection caching. > > > However, it's probably worth checking if it's an issue in your > > installation before over tuning - I think that dovecot's login caching > > can make this a fairly inexpensive process. > > Yeah. imapproxy probably reduces the load a bit, but it probably isn't > anything dramatic with Dovecot. My guess is that it would only reduce > CPU load, but if it's at ~1% already then there's not that much point..
No, you're right, it was much much worse with courier-imap :) We haven't really measured it since it was so obvious with courier. But we do spare some time with fs stats and checkpassword work, and we get a ready connection with a hot cache. -- Jose Celestino SAPO.pt::Systems http://www.sapo.pt --------------------------------------------------------------------- * Progress (n.): The process through which Usenet has evolved from smart people in front of dumb terminals to dumb people in front of smart terminals.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
