Timo Sirainen wrote:
On Mon, 2009-09-28 at 19:21 +0100, Ed W wrote:
In my mind this is more about what lib-storage API was supposed to
abstract out, whereas my filesystem API would be used simply for binary
data storage. The same FS API could be used to store both dbox files and
index files.
I guess in this case it would be interesting to hear the kind of use
cases you imagine that the storage API will be used for in practice? I
think I might be kind of overthinking the problem?
lib-storage API has existed since Dovecot v1.0 and it's used to abstract
out access to maildir, mbox, dbox, cydir, etc. SQL would fit right there
with those.
OK, I thought that was what you were going to be simplifying...
I did have a poke around in there some time back and it did feel "quite
complicated" to follow what was going on... I found your sql backend
code as a simpler way to poke around, but even there it was pretty
quickly going to need some earnest digging to figure out how it was all
working...
OK, I guess this can never be an easy middle ground - presumably things
are as they are for a reason...
Cheers
Ed W
