Please take a look at my post from 1:05PM today with all of my configuration information. Is the problem being caused by something there? I have been working on this for over two weeks, and I have no idea what's what, anymore.
Now I DO understand that it's either setuid-root deliver and use -d from the pipe or do not use setuid-root deliver or -d or a pipe. As it is, there is no other mechanism that I can think of to include an anti-spam program in the mail delivery stream. And I haven't even gotten started trying to include an anti-virus program! (I'm assuming that, too, will require a pipe.) If there is a setup guide for running Postfix+Spamassassin+Dovecot that does not require a pipe, I would be MORE than grateful to learn its location. I have yet to discover one. Even within the config files and docs there are no examples of piping to deliver from Spamassassin, which seems a little unusual, considering the popularity of Spamassassin. James > On Tue, 2009-04-14 at 14:17 -0700, James Butler wrote: >> Oh, that was fun. >> >> Making the change below resulted in mail getting deferred with "Fatal: >> destination user parameter (-d user) not given" ... which apparently is >> caused by running deliver as 'root'! > > I thought you wanted to use -d? There's really no way to make deliveries > working to multiple users via pipe, unless you use -d. > > Perhaps you shouldn't be using the pipe at all. Maybe you should just > put the command to mailbox_command and have it do all the work? Then > there's no need to worry about things like setuid-roots or whatever. > > >
