On Thu, 2009-02-26 at 10:29 -0500, Kevin A. McGrail wrote: > I'll admit that I'm out of my league on this. It does compile with this > change I made but I may not be within the standard for the same reason.
It was standard. > Here's the items I was reading about the issue: > > http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2002-02/msg01874.html But printf() isn't normally a macro. I was also wondering if it was even allowed to be macro, i.e. if your system was completely broken. But looks like it's allowed, so Dovecot shouldn't do that.. Anyway, did a cleaner fix: http://hg.dovecot.org/dovecot-1.1/rev/2c7111b2b0d0
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
