On Tue, 2009-01-27 at 11:21 -0600, Eric Rostetter wrote: > Quoting Timo Sirainen <t...@iki.fi>: > > > Something automated. There are several different testing > > possibilities actually. Unit tests is one thing. > > Last time I brought this up, it lead to so much endless arguing/debate > over what type of testing to use, what toolset to use, etc. that nothing > ever happened.
Why don't I remember the arguing? :) Maybe I was just following to see what's going to be the result and it eventually died out and I thought people just lost interest. > I'd still be willing to do unit tests, if there is no longer any > arguments from others to stop it. I'm open to suggestions as to > tools to use and such as long as it isn't a flame war... I've already written some unit tests in src/tests/. I don't really care if you continue them the way I started or use some other toolset. And unless someone else is also willing to actually write the tests, I don't think you should care all that much about their arguing.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
