On 1/18/09, Timo Sirainen wrote: > Is there any reason not to make (for v1.2) > > 1) deliver -e behavior the defaut? > > 2) not even provide the option for the current default (have deliver send > bounces itself)? > > The only reason it even works like it does currently is because I just > mostly copied what Cyrus did. >
I think doing so would make the system less flexible, and may make unexpected changes to the way a system is currently working. Some may prefer the flexibility of being able to customize the bounce. Recipients may have made rules in their MUAs based on text in current bounces. -- Gary V
