On Mon, 2008-12-15 at 09:40 +0100, Arkadiusz Miskiewicz wrote: > > > > Anyway, you most likely don't really need to use dotlocks at all. Just > > > > make sure that your MDA uses fcntl locks and set > > > > mbox_write_locks=fcntl. > > > > > > Will look. Right now I'm trying to move CONTROL to other fs where quota > > > doesn't apply to see what will happen. > > Done that and now I see a lot of " Expunged message reappeared, giving a new > UID (old uid=10753, file=...)" ugh :-/ > > I guess now imap clients will see these as new messages? > > Also ": IMAP(bo): /var/lib/dovecot/control/xxx/.INBOX/dovecot-uidlist: > Duplicate file entry at line..." > > Weird, these are fresly created control files and now they contain duplicates.
So all your control files were being recreated, but index files weren't? I guess that confused Dovecot somehow. The error messages probably aren't exactly correct, but you created a broken condition anyway. :) > Last question, what permissions are needed for /var/lib/dovecot/control/ if > it's used as CONTROL= and users use different uid/gids? Right now I have > a+rwx which doesn't look nice and root:root 660 also didn't make dovecot > happy. I guess you could make it also +t. There's really no better way since the directories aren't created as root.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
