On Thu, 2008-10-30 at 14:42 -0400, Allen Belletti wrote: > I'd like to add my vote here as well; dbox would be *the* feature that > would make me happy. I'm the guy who asked a few weeks ago about ways to > speed access on our GFS clustered mail environment. > > Meanwhile, I've done some preliminary testing with mbox. As expected, > it's vastly faster than the Maildirs that we're using now. Of course it > pains me to go "backwards" but that may be the interim solution. I got > stopped temporarily when it seemed that I couldn't nest folders using > mbox, but hopefully that's untrue.
You could use Maildir++ layout with mboxes too: mail_location = mbox:~/mail:LAYOUT=maildir++ mbox handling code is less stable than maildir code though.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
